Himalia (moon)

Himalia
Low-resolution image of Himalia from Cassini, December 2000
Discovery[1]
Discovered byCharles D. Perrine
Discovery siteLick Observatory
Discovery date3 December 1904
Designations
Designation
Jupiter VI
Pronunciation/hɪˈmliə/ or /hɪˈmɑːliə/[2]
Named after
Ἱμαλία Himalia
AdjectivesHimalian[3]
Orbital characteristics[4]
Epoch 27 April 2019 (JD 2458600.5)
Observation arc114.25 yr (41,728 days)
0.0761287 AU (11,388,690 km)
Eccentricity0.1537860
+248.29 d
94.30785°
1° 26m 59.616s / day
Inclination29.90917° (to the ecliptic)
44.99935°
21.60643°
Satellite ofJupiter
GroupHimalia group
Physical characteristics
Dimensions205.6 × 141.3 km (occultation, projected)[5]
(150 × 120) ± 20 km (Cassini estimate)[6]
139.6±1.7 km[7]
170±20 km[8]
Mass(4.2±0.6)×1018 kg[9]
(1.9–4.2)×1018 kg[10]
Mean density
3.33±0.47 g/cm3 (assuming radius 67 km)[9]
1.63 g/cm3 (assuming radius 85 km)[11]
7.7819±0.0005 h[12]
Albedo0.057±0.008[7]
0.05±0.01[6]
Spectral type
C[7]
14.6[13]
7.9[4]

Himalia (/hɪˈmliə, hɪˈmɑːliə/), also known as Jupiter VI, is the largest irregular satellite of Jupiter. With a diameter of around 140 km (90 mi), it is the sixth largest Jovian satellite, after the four Galilean moons and Amalthea. It was discovered by Charles Dillon Perrine at the Lick Observatory on 3 December 1904 and is named after the nymph Himalia, who bore three sons of Zeus (the Greek equivalent of Jupiter).[1] It is the largest member of the Himalia group, a group of moons that orbit in the prograde direction around Jupiter, likely a collisional family originating from a captured asteroid.

Discovery and naming

Himalia was discovered by Charles Dillon Perrine at the Lick Observatory on 3 December 1904 in photographs taken with the 36-inch Crossley reflecting telescope which he had recently rebuilt.[1]

The moon is named after the nymph Himalia, who bore three sons of Zeus (the Greek equivalent of Jupiter). The moon did not receive its present name until 1975;[14] before then, it was simply known as Jupiter VI or Jupiter Satellite VI, although calls for a full name appeared shortly after its and Elara's discovery. A.C.D. Crommelin wrote in 1905:

Unfortunately the numeration of Jupiter's satellites is now in precisely the same confusion as that of Saturn's system was before the numbers were abandoned and names substituted. A similar course would seem to be advisable here; the designation V for the inner satellite [Amalthea] was tolerated for a time, as it was considered to be in a class by itself; but it has now got companions, so that this subterfuge disappears. The substitution of names for numerals is certainly more poetic.[15]

The moon was sometimes called Hestia, after the Greek goddess, from 1955 to 1975.[16]

Physical characteristics

Cassini image of Himalia, taken in December 2000 from a distance of 4.4 million kilometres

Resolved images of Himalia by Cassini have led to a size estimate of 150 km × 120 km (93 mi × 75 mi),[6] however due to the effects of limb darkening, the larger dimension may be a better reflection of its true size.[17] Ground-based estimates suggest that Himalia is large, with a diameter around 170 km (110 mi).[6][8] In May 2018, Himalia occulted a star, allowing for precise measurements of its size. The occultation was observed from the US state of Georgia. From the occultation, Himalia was given a size estimate of 205.6 km × 141.3 km (127.8 mi × 87.8 mi), in agreement with earlier ground-based estimates.[5]

Himalia appears neutral in color (grey), like the other members of its group, with colour indices B−V=0.62, V−R=0.4, similar to a C-type asteroid.[18] Measurements by Cassini confirm a featureless spectrum, with a slight absorption at 3 μm, which could indicate the presence of water.[19]

Mass

In 2005, Emelyanov estimated Himalia to have a mass of (4.2±0.6)×1018 kg (GM=0.28±0.04), based on a perturbation of Elara on July 15, 1949, when the distance between them became a mere 65031 kilometers.[9] Also in 2005, Christou tested several different masses of Himalia in a range of (1.7–5.2)×1018 kg to investigate a hypothesis that it gravitationally scattered other members of the Himalia group,[20] and the hypothesis was found plausible given the mass was on the higher end, which was consistent with Emelyanov's estimate.[17] However a later study asserted that at least twice that mass was required to fully explain the dispersion of the group.[21] In 2017, Brozović and Jacobson found that Himalia's mass is constrained to (1.9–4.2)×1018 kg (GM=0.13–0.28), and showed that its mass could not be much larger than the value found by Emelyanov.[10]

Although Himalia is the sixth-largest moon of Jupiter by size, it is probably the fifth-most massive. Amalthea is only a few kilometers bigger, but less dense. Himalia's density depends on whether it has an average radius of about 67 km (geometric mean from Cassini)[a] or a radius closer to 85 km.[8]

Orbit and rotation

Animation of Himalia's orbit.
   Jupiter ·    Himalia ·   Callisto
Himalia's rotational light curve from Earth-based observations taken between August and October 2010.[12]

Himalia orbits Jupiter at an average distance of 11,388,690 km km in 248,29 days, at an inclination of about 30° to the ecliptic, in a prograde direction and with an eccentricity of 0.154. Its orbit is continuously changing due to solar and planetary perturbations.

It gives its name to the Himalia group, a prograde group of moons orbiting between 11 and 13 Gm from Jupiter at inclinations between 27 and 30°, and eccentricities between 0.11 and 0.24.

Himalia's rotational period is 7 h 46 m 55±2 s.[12]

Himalia ring

Composite of six New Horizons images of the possible Himalia ring. The double exposure of Himalia is circled. The arrow points to Jupiter.

In September 2006, as NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto approached Jupiter for a gravity assist, it photographed what appeared to be a faint new planetary ring parallel with and slightly inside Himalia's orbit. Because the small (4-km) moon Dia, which had a similar orbit to Himalia, had gone missing since its discovery in 2000, there was some speculation that the ring could be debris from an impact of Dia into Himalia, suggesting that Jupiter continued to gain and lose small moons through collisions.[22] However, an impact by an object the size of Dia would produce far more material than the calculated amount of ejected material needed to form the ring, although it is possible that a smaller, unknown moon may have been involved instead.[23] The recovery of Dia in 2010 and 2011 disproved any connection between Dia and the Himalia ring.[24][25]

Origin

Himalia probably did not form near Jupiter but was captured by Jupiter later. Like the other members of the Himalia group, which have similar orbits, it is probably the remnant of a broken, captured heliocentric asteroid. It has been suggested that Himalia or its parent asteroid was originally from the Nysa family or the Hilda group, and the members of its group all have similar colours.[20] However, the members of the Himalia group appear to have a larger dispersion velocity than expected; proposals such as a secondary collision event or gravitational scattering by Himalia are suggested to explain this.[26][20]

Observation and exploration

Phases of Himalia imaged by the LORRI instrument aboard New Horizons
Himalia observed by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) spacecraft in 2014

Himalia is Jupiter's most easily observed small satellite; though Amalthea is brighter, its proximity to the planet's brilliant disk makes it a far more difficult object to view.[27][28]

Himalia is one of the largest planetary moons in the Solar System not imaged in detail, and the third largest not imaged in detail which is not within the orbit of Neptune. It is the largest with the exception of Sycorax and Puck orbiting Uranus, some of the moons of Neptune and several trans-Neptunian objects, particularly Dysnomia, the moon of Eris.

In November 2000, the Cassini spacecraft, en route to Saturn, made a number of images of Himalia, including photos from a distance of 4.4 million km. Himalia covers only a few pixels, but seems to be an elongated object with axes (150 × 120) ± 20 km, close to the Earth-based estimations.[6]

In February and March 2007, the New Horizons spacecraft en route to Pluto made a series of images of Himalia, culminating in photos from a distance of 8 million km. Again, Himalia appears only a few pixels across.[29]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ However, instead of the geometric mean, Emelyanov simply uses a value of 67 km exactly,[9] while Brozović and Jacobson use the arithmetic mean of 67.5 km.[10]

References

  1. ^ a b c Porter, J.G. (1905). "Discovery of a Sixth Satellite of Jupiter". Astronomical Journal. 24 (18): 154B. Bibcode:1905AJ.....24..154P. doi:10.1086/103612.;
    Perrine, C.D. (25 January 1905). "Sixth Satellite of Jupiter Confirmed". Harvard College Observatory Bulletin. 175: 1. Bibcode:1905BHarO.175....1P.;
    Perrine, C.D. (1905). "Discovery of a Sixth Satellite to Jupiter". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 17 (100): 22–23. Bibcode:1905PASP...17...22.. doi:10.1086/121619.;
    Perrine, C.D. (1905). "Orbits of the sixth and seventh satellites of Jupiter". Astronomische Nachrichten. 169 (3): 43–44. Bibcode:1905AN....169...43P. doi:10.1002/asna.19051690304.
  2. ^ Daintith & Gould (2006) The Facts on File Dictionary of Astronomy, p. 216
  3. ^ Yenne (1987) The Atlas of the Solar System.
  4. ^ a b "M.P.C. 115889" (PDF). Minor Planet Circular. Minor Planet Center. 27 August 2019. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  5. ^ a b N. Smith; R. Venable (12 May 2018). "Jupiter (06) Himalia". www.asteroidoccultation.com. Archived from the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 23 July 2018.
  6. ^ a b c d e Porco, Carolyn C.; et al. (March 2003). "Cassini Imaging of Jupiter's Atmosphere, Satellites, and Rings". Science. 299 (5612): 1541–1547. Bibcode:2003Sci...299.1541P. doi:10.1126/science.1079462. PMID 12624258. S2CID 20150275.
  7. ^ a b c Grav, T.; Bauer, J. M.; Mainzer, A. K.; Masiero, J. R.; Nugent, C. R.; Cutri, R. M.; et al. (August 2015). "NEOWISE: Observations of the Irregular Satellites of Jupiter and Saturn". The Astrophysical Journal. 809 (1): 9. arXiv:1505.07820. Bibcode:2015ApJ...809....3G. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/3. S2CID 5834661. 3.
  8. ^ a b c Archinal, B. A.; Acton, C. H.; A’Hearn, M. F.; Conrad, A.; Consolmagno, G. J.; Duxbury, T.; Hestroffer, D.; Hilton, J. L.; Kirk, R. L.; Klioner, S. A.; McCarthy, D.; Meech, K.; Oberst, J.; Ping, J.; Seidelmann, P. K. (23 February 2018). "Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2015". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 130 (3). Bibcode:2018CeMDA.130...22A. doi:10.1007/s10569-017-9805-5. ISSN 0923-2958.
  9. ^ a b c d Emelyanov, N.V. (18 July 2005). "The mass of Himalia from the perturbations on other satellites" (PDF). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 438 (3): L33–L36. Bibcode:2005A&A...438L..33E. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200500143.
  10. ^ a b c Brozović, Marina; Jacobson, Robert A. (1 April 2017). "The Orbits of Jupiter's Irregular Satellites". The Astronomical Journal. 153 (4): 147. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5e4d. ISSN 0004-6256.
  11. ^ Chen, Zhenghan; Yang, Kun; Liu, Xiaodong (23 December 2023). ""Life" of dust originating from the irregular satellites of Jupiter". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527 (4): 11327–11337. arXiv:2402.03680. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3829. ISSN 0035-8711.
  12. ^ a b c Pilcher, Frederick; Mottola, Stefano; Denk, Tilmann (2012). "Photometric lightcurve and rotation period of Himalia (Jupiter VI)". Icarus. 219 (2): 741–742. Bibcode:2012Icar..219..741P. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.03.021.
  13. ^ "Planetary Satellite Physical Parameters". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  14. ^ Marsden, B. G. (7 October 1975). "IAUC 2846: N Mon 1975 (= A0620-00); N Cyg 1975; 1975h; 1975g; 1975i; Sats OF JUPITER". Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams. IAU. Retrieved 9 September 2018.
  15. ^ Crommelin, A. C. D. (10 March 1905). "Provisional Elements of Jupiter's Satellite VI". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 65 (5): 524–527. Bibcode:1905MNRAS..65..524C. doi:10.1093/mnras/65.5.524.
  16. ^ Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia; Katherine Haramundanis (1970). Introduction to Astronomy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-478107-5.
  17. ^ a b Jewitt, David; Haghighipour, Nader (1 September 2007). "Irregular Satellites of the Planets: Products of Capture in the Early Solar System". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 45 (1): 261–295. arXiv:astro-ph/0703059v1. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092459. ISSN 0066-4146.
  18. ^ Rettig, T. W.; Walsh, K.; Consolmagno, G. (December 2001). "Implied Evolutionary Differences of the Jovian Irregular Satellites from a BVR Color Survey". Icarus. 154 (2): 313–320. Bibcode:2001Icar..154..313R. doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6715.
  19. ^ Chamberlain, Matthew A.; Brown, Robert H. (2004). "Near-infrared spectroscopy of Himalia". Icarus. 172 (1): 163–169. Bibcode:2004Icar..172..163C. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.016.
  20. ^ a b c Christou, Apostolos A. (March 2005). "Gravitational scattering within the Himalia group of jovian prograde irregular satellites". Icarus. 174 (1): 215–229. Bibcode:2005Icar..174..215C. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.016.
  21. ^ Li, Daohai; Christou, Apostolos A. (1 August 2018). "Long-term self-modification of irregular satellite groups". Icarus. 310: 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.004. ISSN 0019-1035.
  22. ^ "Lunar marriage may have given Jupiter a ring". New Scientist. 20 March 2010. p. 16.
  23. ^ Cheng, A. F.; Weaver, H. A.; Nguyen, L.; Hamilton, D. P.; Stern, S. A.; Throop, H. B. (March 2010). A New Ring or Ring Arc of Jupiter? (PDF). 41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute. p. 2549. Bibcode:2010LPI....41.2549C.
  24. ^ Gareth V. Williams (11 September 2012). "MPEC 2012-R22 : S/2000 J 11". Minor Planet Center. Archived from the original on 21 August 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  25. ^ "Long Lost Moon of Jupiter Found". Carnegie Science | DTM. 13 May 2013. Retrieved 9 September 2018.
  26. ^ Sheppard, Scott S.; Williams, Gareth V.; Tholen, David J.; Trujillo, Chadwick A.; Brozovic, Marina; Thirouin, Audrey; Devogele, Maxime; Fohring, Dora; Jacobson, Robert; Moskovitz, Nicholas A. (1 August 2018). "New Jupiter Satellites and Moon-Moon Collisions". Research Notes of the AAS. 2 (3): 155. arXiv:1809.00700. Bibcode:2018RNAAS...2..155S. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aadd15. ISSN 2515-5172.
  27. ^ "Himalia, Jupiter's "fifth" moon". October 2009. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011.
  28. ^ Rick Scott (20 October 2003). "Finding Himalia, The Fifth Brightest Moon Of Jupiter". Astronomy.net. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
  29. ^ Lakdawalla, E. (1 March 2007). "The Bruce Murray Space Image Library – Jupiter's moon Himalia". Retrieved 17 November 2018.