Ephebus

Taxonavigation

Taxonavigation: Coccinelloidea 

Superregnum: Eukaryota
Cladus: Amorphea
Cladus: Obazoa
Cladus: Opisthokonta
Cladus: Holozoa
Cladus: Filozoa
Cladus: Choanozoa
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: ParaHoxozoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Cladus: Protostomia
Superphylum: Ecdysozoa
Cladus: Panarthropoda
Phylum: Arthropoda
Cladus: Mandibulata
Cladus: Pancrustacea
Cladus: Allotriocarida
Subphylum: Hexapoda
Classis: Insecta
Cladus: Dicondylia
Subclassis: Pterygota
Infraclassis: Neoptera
Cladus: Eumetabola
Cladus: Holometabola
Superordo: Coleopterida
Ordo: Coleoptera
Subordo: Polyphaga
Infraordo: Cucujiformia
Superfamilia: Coccinelloidea

Familia: Endomychidae
Subfamilia: Epipocinae
Genus: Ephebus
Species: E. cardinalis – E. chontalesianus – E. convexiusculus – E. exclusus – E. hirtulus – E. longulus – E. piceus – E. pumilus – E. sulcatus – E. terminatus

Name

Ephebus Gerstaecker 1858.
[! see comments on earlier usage].

Type species: Ephebus cardinalis Gerstaecker 1858, by subsequent designation in [?].

Gender: masculine

Note: [!] Strohecker, 1975 (p.333) indicate the name is first made available by Gerstaecker 1858 with the type species Ephebus cardinalis Gerstaecker, 1958. This is later echoed in e.g. Shockley et al., 2009: 23. In contrast, Arriaga-Varela et al., 2007 comment (p.17) that "According to Bousquet (2004) the name Ephebus was first validated by Chevrolat (1836) in the fifth release of Dejean's second edition of his catalogue, not by Gerstaecker (1858) as previously suggested." If this is the case however, Ephebus cardinalis cannot be the type species (as also claimed by Arriaga-Varela et al., 2007) because it was was not among the species included in that older work.

Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836: 439 contains eight species vestitus Dej.; erotyloides Chevrolat; ursinus Dej.; pubescens Dej.; nigricornis Dej.; globosus Dej.; limbatus Dej.; hispidus? Hebst (Erotylus) [perhaps implying the latter two are synonyms]. This formation is then discussed by D'Orbigny, 1844 (1854?) alongside a diagnostic description. The availability of the genus (and its authorship) then depends on whether any of the Dejean's mentioned species were then available. Bousquet & Bouchard & 2013: 140) indicate that there are no available species names in the earliest usage by Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836, therefore it is nomen nudum.

Gerstaecker, 1858: 293 originally included five species, E. cardinalis Gerstaecker, 1858; E. terminatus Gerstaecker, 1858; E. convexiusculus Gerstaecker, 1858; E. pumilus Gerstaecker, 1858; E. hirtulus Gerstaecker, 1858; none of which are previously mentioned by Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836.

Synonymy

  • Ephebus Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836: 439 (unavailable, nomen nudum. No available species names per Bousquet & Bouchard & 2013: 140)
  • [?]Leochares Gistl, 1848: 406 (nomen nudum [?unavailable]. In IRMNG, says "unaccepted (unnecessary replacement name)" for Ephebus Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836]
  • Ephebus Chevrolat in D'Orbigny, 1844 (1854?): 346 (nomen nudum [?])
  • Ephebus Gerstaecker, 1858: 293.

References

Primary references

Additional references

  • Arriaga-Varela, E., Tomaszewska, K.W., & Navarette-Heredia, J.L. 2007. A synopsis of the Endomychidae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) of México. Zootaxa 1594: 1–38. Abstract & excerpt PDF Reference page. 
  • Bousquet, Y. 2004. The works of P.F.M.A. Dejean, with emphasis on publication dates and new carabid taxa proposed. Fabreries 29(1): 33–48. PDF. Reference page. 
  • Shockley, F.W., Tomaszewska, K.W. & McHugh, J.V. 2009. An annotated checklist of the handsome fungus beetles of the world (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Endomychidae). Zootaxa 1999: 1–113. Abstract & excerpt ResearchGate PDF Reference page. 
For more multimedia, look at Ephebus on Wikimedia Commons.